Page 4 - WEF Reoprt 2020
P. 4
The Global Shapers Risks Landscape 2020
Figure III: The Global Shapers Risk Landscape 2020 The Global Risks Interconnections Map 2020
Economic Environmental
Climate Biodiversity
action failure loss
d
i
l
disasters
s
e
r
t
a
s
a
r
t
u
Natural
a
Extreme N Natural disasters s
Human-made
environmental weather
disasters Natural disasters
4.0 4.0 4.0
n
a
-
m
a
d
u
e
m
x
m
t
e
E Extreme weatherweather
e
Critical Unemployment Extr r eme w e a t h e r H Human-madeHuman-made
a
s
i
s
o
onmental
n
m
n
e
r
d
i
t
a
l
v
envir
n
t
e
Financial infra- e environmental disaster r
failure structure
failure disasters
Unmanageable Fiscal crises
inflation Asset bubbles
t
3.5 Energy price shock 3.5 I Infectious diseases s
d
e
diseases
i
o
u
s
e
i
e
a
f
c
s
n Infectious
s
Deflation
Illicit trade
crises
e
s
i
r
s
o
o
F Food crises Biodiversity l o s s
Food
c
d
o
d
i
i
s
B Biodiversity lossloss
t
y
r
e
i
v
e
o
u
i
l
F Failure of
Failur r e of f
a
Impact G Global l
3.0 3.0 u urban planning
b
n
planning
p
a
n
l
r urban
n
a
g
n
i
a
o
b
l Global
v
s
e
a
o
mass
o
o
p
of
s
n
a
governance
W
m
f
eapons
e
n
a
e
n
c
r
2.5
Likelihood 3.0 3.5 4.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 g governance W Weapons of mass s
o
destruction
i
n
r
t
c
u
t
d destruction
s
e
l
u
r
f failure
e
i
a failure
Geopolitical Societal W Water crises C Climate action
W
ater
a
t
r
s
i
crises
e
r
c
e
s
i
t
i
e
a
action
a
c
n
m
l Climate
t
o
r
f failure
e
e
u
a failur
l
i
Water crises
Weapons of C Critical infrastructure
l
c
r
a
f
t
i
Critical
t
i
t
c
r
e
e
r
u
i
n
u
s
r
a
infrastructur
mass destruction
l
e
r
u
i
e
a failur
Food 3.5 f failure
crises Average
Infectious
r
n
t
e
a
t
e
s
t
diseases I InterstateInterstate
3.47 I Involuntary migration
m
i
migration
a
t
y
r
o
i
a
r
g
n
t
u
o
n Involuntary
n
v
l
i
fl
c
n
o
4.0 Interstate 4.0 c conflictconflict t
n
i
a
a
t
conflict N NationalNational l
o
o
m
r
n
t
i
n
a
f
o
Terrorist State I InformationInformation
e
n
f
i infrastructuree
a
r
t
c
u
v
r
u
t
s
g governancenance
o
attacks collapse Global governance failure Involuntary infrastructur r e gover r n a n c e
migration
r br
w
n
o
a
e
k
eakdown
d
u
i
a
f failuree
l
l
i
l Illicit
c
a
r
National Failure of b breakdown Cyberattacks failur r e I Illicit trade e
d
t
i
t
trade
a
t
t
s
k
c
b
e
C Cyberattacks
y
a
r
governance urban planning
failure
3.5 3.5
s
n
i
b
a
t
o
S Social instability
Social l instability
a
i
c
i
l
y
t
i
Social instability
s
t
attacks
orist
r
i
t
a
c
a
k
t
e
T
r
err
r
o
T Terrorist attacks s
t State
a
c
collapse
S State collapse
t
l
e
o
s
p
a
l
e
Data f r a u d A Adverse technologicaltechnological l
D Data fraudfraud
a
a
t
Adverse
h
s
o
e
n
e
v
t
e
c
d
r
i
g
a
c
o
l
Impact
3.0 3.0 or r t theft t a advancesadvances Ener r gy y price e s h o c k
o or theft
f
e
h
d
c
e
s
v
a
n
r
n
p
E Energy price shockshock
i
c
e
g
l
n
y
n
U Unemployment
o
m
e
m
p
e
crises
a
i
c
c
r
s
Likelihood 3.0 3.5 4.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Unemployment t F Fiscal crises
s
l
e
s
i Fiscal
2.5
i
F Financial failure
a
n
Financial
n
i
l
a
l
failur
f
a
e
e
c
i
r
u
Technological Respondents 3.0 Unmanageable e i n fl a t i o n
a
e
g
b
m
a
l
U Unmanageable inflationinflation
n
n
a
o
e
D Deflation
n
t
fl
a
i
Asset t b u b b l e Deflation
e
A Asset bubblebubbles
s
s
Cyberattacks Shapers
4.0 Information Multistakeholder
infrastructure
breakdown 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Data fraud or theft Average
The Global Shapers Community is the World Likelihood 3.32
The Global Shapers Community is the World
Economic Forum’s network of young people
Economic Forum’s network of young people
driving dialogue, action and change. Economic Geopolitical Technological
3.5 driving dialogue, action and change. Risks Risks Risks
Number and strength
Environmental Societal of connections
Adverse
technological Risks Risks (“weighted degree”)
advances Source: World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2019–2020.
Note: We applied the same completion thresholds to survey responses from the
Global Shapers as to the multi-stakeholder sample (see Appendix B: Global Risks
Impact Global Shapers as to the multistakeholder sample (see Appendix B: Global Risks
3.0 Note: We applied the same completion thresholds to survey responses from the
Perception Survey and Methodology).
We received 236 responses for Part 1 “The World in 2020” and 190 for Part 2
Perception Survey and Methodology).
“Assessment of Global Risks”. The data for Part 3 “Global Risk Interconnections”
was not used.
“Assessment of Global Risks”. The data for Part 3 “Global Risk Interconnections”
Likelihood 3.0 3.5 4.0 We received 236 responses for Part 1 “The World in 2020” and 190 for Part 2 Source: World Economic Forum Global Risks Note: Survey respondents were asked to select up to six pairs of global risks they believe to be most interconnected.
See Appendix B for more details. To ensure legibility, the names of the global risks are abbreviated; see Appendix A for
2.5
Perception Survey 2019–2020.
were not used.
full names and descriptions.

